[lucida] lucida, sudden doubt

[Enrico Bernardi]

Hi Ulrich

you are right: they are essentially the same. I was looking at the TeXShop console, something different from the log.
Anyway these warnings are still there.

Enrico
On Dec 9, 2010, at 10:23 AM, Ulrich Groh wrote:

> There is no difference between TeXshop and terminal at my installation.
> 
> Am 09.12.2010 um 16:13 schrieb Vic Norton:
> 
>> No, Enrico. I don't do TeX outside of TeXShop.  - Vic
>> 
>> On Dec 9, 2010, at 9:31 AM, Enrico Bernardi wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Vic
>>> 
>>> thanks for the reply. If I typeset lucida-sample.tex within TeXShop and look at the output of its console, I also do not get anything, and the only reference I see is like yours.
>>> But I am typesetting either via Aquamacs or he command line. And then alas I see these not available warnings, pretty annoying. Did you check outside TeXShop?
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> Enrico
>>> On Dec 9, 2010, at 9:03 AM, lucida-request at tug.org wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Send lucida mailing list submissions to
>>>> 	lucida at tug.org
>>>> 
>>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>>> 	http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/lucida
>>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>>> 	lucida-request at tug.org
>>>> 
>>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>>> 	lucida-owner at tug.org
>>>> 
>>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>>> than "Re: Contents of lucida digest..."
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Today's Topics:
>>>> 
>>>> 1. Re: sudden doubt (Vic Norton)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> 
>>>> Message: 1
>>>> Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 09:03:31 -0500
>>>> From: Vic Norton <vic at norton.name>
>>>> To: Enrico Bernardi <enrico.bernardi at gmail.com>
>>>> Cc: TeXnical discussion of the Lucida fonts <lucida at tug.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: [lucida] sudden doubt
>>>> Message-ID: <443E4102-8625-4752-BD76-6E4076D48C8C at norton.name>
>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Enrico,
>>>> 
>>>> I use the complete Lucida font set from TUG. When I compile "lucida-sample.tex" with TeXShop (Mac), I see no such lines in my log. The string "hlcw" only occurs in the following paragraph:
>>>> 
>>>> Overfull \hbox (14.3266pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 290--290
>>>> \T1/hlh/m/n/10.95 LucidaCalligraphy- 
>>>> (/usr/local/texlive/2010/../texmf-local/tex/latex/lucida/t1hlce.fd)
>>>> Overfull \hbox (19.29813pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 293--293
>>>> \T1/hlh/m/n/10.95 LucidaHandwriting- 
>>>> (/usr/local/texlive/2010/../texmf-local/tex/latex/lucida/t1hlcw.fd) [6]
>>>> (/usr/local/texlive/2010/../texmf-local/tex/latex/lucida/t1hlcf.fd) [7]
>>>> (./lucida-sample.aux) )
>>>> 
>>>> Apparently your Lucida font implementation is a lot different than mine.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> 
>>>> Vic
>>>> 
>>>> On Dec 9, 2010, at 7:58 AM, Enrico Bernardi wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have been using the Lucida fonts for a while to my general
>>>>> satisfaction and without too much exploring the logs. For some reason
>>>>> today, typesetting the lucida-sample.tex from
>>>>> http://tug.org/store/lucida/samples.html I decided to take a closer
>>>>> look at lucida-sample.log.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Here is what I find a bit suspicious in the log, a complete output of
>>>>> which I post below:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> LaTeX Font Info:    Font shape `T1/hlcw/m/n' in size <10.95> not available
>>>>> (Font)              Font shape `T1/hlcw/m/it' tried instead on input line 293.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Is it normal?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Also typesetting lucida-oneline-samples.tex from the same web-site I
>>>>> get in the log:
>>>>> 
>>>>> LaTeX Font Warning: Font shape `T1/hls/bf/n' undefined
>>>>> (Font)              using `T1/hls/m/n' instead on input line 87.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Do I have to worry about my installation? Everything takes place in
>>>>> Mac OS X, TexLive-2010-64 distribution and the fonts bought maybe 6
>>>>> months ago.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Also one further question: I usually put in the preamble
>>>>> 
>>>>> \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
>>>>> \usepackage[expert,vargreek,altbullet]{lucidabr}
>>>>> 
>>>>> while in the lucida-sample.tex we have:
>>>>> 
>>>>> % use Lucida fonts for both text and math.
>>>>> \usepackage[altbullet]{lucidabr}     % get larger bullet
>>>>> \DeclareEncodingSubset{TS1}{hlh}{1}  % including \oldstylenums
>>>>> 
>>>>> Where could I read some explanation about the difference between the
>>>>> two declarations?
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thank you
>>>>> 
>>>>> Enrico
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> http://tug.org/lucida/
>> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/lucida
>