[luatex] a question about the names \Umathcharnumdef etc
d.p.carlisle at gmail.com
Fri Oct 16 09:53:40 CEST 2015
On 16 October 2015 at 08:47, Ulrike Fischer <luatex at nililand.de> wrote:
> Am Thu, 15 Oct 2015 18:18:58 +0100 schrieb David Carlisle:
>>> or perhaps \Umathcharnumdef was always ok ?
>> yes, it was, the Umath... commands were always available with their
>> basic luatex names and also prefixed luatex.
> That's not true. In a texlive 2012
Sigh. Sorry, thanks for the correction. I could have sworn it wasn't that way
but I'm happy to believe you!
Just goes to show how confusing this prefixing stuff is, will be
simpler going forward
as latex doesn't prefix things "luatex" and luatex is prefixing less
things with "pdf":-)
More information about the luatex