[luatex] convention for lua packages and file names
Hans Hagen
pragma at wxs.nl
Fri Feb 20 13:17:40 CET 2009
Karl Berry wrote:
> maybe prefixing all with simple would do the trick? simplemplib.sty and
> simplemplib.lua? Or a random two-letter prefix, for example lkmplib,
> ermplib, ctmplib?
>
> Neither of these seem like a good convention to me, considering we may
> have dozens/hundreds of these in the future.
>
> I guess my suggestion remains just "lua" for the prefix for packages
> that run with luatex.
>
> luainputenc
> luamcallbacks
> luamplib
> luatextra
>
> Names are hard.
it all depends on how well the variables in texmf.cnf are defined, i.e.
macro package specific namespaces; *inputenc in probably only used in
latex but *mplib is more generic; in any case i wouldn't count too much
on names being unique (for context we have a rather rigourous scheme so
i don't expect too many clashes there within the context texmf.cnf
namespace)
btw, .sty is rather unique for latex so that creates a kind of
namespace; so maybe blabla.sty should then use blabla.stl or so
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the luatex
mailing list