[lltx] luatexbase, luatextra etc.

[Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard]

Le 10/05/2010 15:01, Khaled Hosny a écrit :
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 03:33:00PM +0300, Elie Roux wrote:
>> Khaled Hosny a écrit :
>>> BTW, I think now is better than later to pick a less confusing name for
>>> luaextra, any suggestions?
>>
>> I agree on this. What about lualibs? Just a thought: what about
>> integrating alt-getopt.lua in lua[extra/libs]? This would make sense
>> for me...
> 
> alt-getopt.lua is genric lua code with no luatex specific dependencies
> unlike most of current luaextra modules, so I'm not sure if it really
> makes sense.
> 
I agree. In a more general way, it doesn't make sense IMO to have big packages
with many different things in it, unless they are interdependent.

Manuel.