[latexrefman] Suggestion for future update

[Hefferon, Jim S.]

Pablo,

I can't speak to the first part, but ...

> Apart (I don't know if it goes in this list, but they are the same authors and
it is related)

> The file `latex-doc-ptr` may need to be updated a little bit, some links are
broken and the reference name to this guide is a bit strange (LaTeX: Structured
documents for TEX) and it is an important file since it is the one that throws
`texdoc latex` by default and it is the first thing that new users look for.

Thanks for this.  I'll have a look and upload corrections.  But I just gave midterms yesterday so it may be a week or two.

Regards,
Jim

---------------
They want to steal the future, from you.

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2020/11/what-if-trump-refuses-concede/616424/

It is up to you: https://www.vote.org/


________________________________________
From: latexrefman <latexrefman-bounces+jhefferon=smcvt.edu at tug.org> on behalf of Pablo González L <pablgonz at educarchile.cl>
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2020 23:54
To: latexrefman at tug.org
Subject: [latexrefman] Suggestion for future update

⚠ External Sender ⚠


Hi, first of all I'm just giving birth thanks for the great work :-)
A note for the future, with the changes introduced in 2020 (`-dev`) and that
will be implemented directly at some point, you will be able to use `xparse`
for new commands and environments, will you be able to add a comment of this in
the future version?

Apart (I don't know if it goes in this list, but they are the same authors and
it is related)

The file `latex-doc-ptr` may need to be updated a little bit, some links are
broken and the reference name to this guide is a bit strange (LaTeX: Structured
documents for TEX) and it is an important file since it is the one that throws
`texdoc latex` by default and it is the first thing that new users look for.
Greetings
Pablo