[latexrefman] [latexrefman-commits] [SCM] latexrefman updated: r590 - trunk
Vincent Belaïche
vincent.belaiche at gmail.com
Tue Aug 22 18:15:36 CEST 2017
Hello Karl & Jim,
Sorry for the @dmn{}, in French we have it, after all this is a unit,
isn't it :
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pourcentage#Notation
I will remove this @dmn{} as well as restoring the cmss/cmtt. cmr is
still there, only cmss & cmtt were removed, maybe to encourage the
switch to Latin Modern --- I don't know, I am not the one who removed them.
The percents were added by Jim in r361, see
http://svn.gnu.org.ua/viewvc/latexrefman/trunk/latex2e.texi?r1=361&r2=360
Personnally, I don't think that it was a bad idea, because anyway the
current text says that this is just informative, and not followed by all
font.
The cmss & cmtt were removed by Jim in r362, see
http://svn.gnu.org.ua/viewvc/latexrefman/trunk/latex2e.texi?r1=361&r2=362
I agree with you Karl that for consistency cmss & cmtt should be restored.
Vincent.
Le 22/08/2017 à 00:50, Karl Berry a écrit :
> Yes, cmr/cmss/cmtt should be in (restored to) the \fontfamily table,
> as far as I can see.
>
> + at tab Ultra condensed, 50 at dmn{}%
>
> Any extra before % is not conventional in English.
>
> Inependently of that, I don't see that those percentages are useful to
> state. I am skeptical that there is a single font in the world which
> follows them. 112.5%? Who are we kidding? I'm not sure who added them,
> but if it was me, I think I was wrong to do so. -k
Jim added them.
---
L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le logiciel antivirus Avast.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
More information about the latexrefman
mailing list