[latexrefman-discuss] Fwd: REVIEW REQUEST - user manual generation
vincent.belaiche at domain.hid
Tue May 10 11:13:37 CEST 2016
Answering to myself: I had been a bit too hasty, patch #7 sent
preivously was working properly, but the naming of variable
_run_tex_in_input_funnies was not corresponding any longer to its
content, so I have slightly modified the code for it to have the same
meaning as before (as in patch #6).
>Le 09/05/2016 21:27, Gavin Smith a écrit :
>> On 9 May 2016 at 20:21, Gavin Smith <gavinsmith0123 at domain.hid> wrote:
>>>> I guess that with all those changes, but except for the space that
>>>> is a deep tex engine limitation, only the Devil could find a valid
>>>> filename not working.
>> I was going to say, I don't think it's important to support spaces in
>> filenames. (texi2dvi "My Manual.texi" won't work, for example.) The
>> main problem is spaces in higher-level directories, but they
>> shouldn't be a problem any more now we use absolute paths less. I'd
>> say that supporting unusual filenames isn't important. There was
>> already support for tildes (~) in filenames (Debian used them for
>> some reason), but the other characters are easy to avoid by avoiding
>> using them in the filename. Nonetheless it's good that you found a
>> way to support them - it makes texi2dvi slightly more robust for
>> unexpected circumstances. It's good that much of this code isn't used
>> if the filename doesn't contain any unusual characters; this reduces
>> the likelihood of something breaking.
>I definitely 200% support your point that we should not change the
>simple \input FILENAME way when there is no need for that. So, I have
>modified the patch so that the condition to trigger the complex way is
>that the filename contain TeX special character, previously that
>condition was that the filename contains non-alphanumeric characters
>which is far broader.
>In a nutshell, if the filename contains only alphanumeric or '+' or
>'-', the new patch will just \input FILENAME, but if the filename
>contains '%' or '#', then it will use the TeX tricks.
>I also fixed some comments and added '_' into the list of handled TeX
>special characters, for consistency with handling also '$'. Modern tex
>engines seem to already do appropriate catcoding for the math special
>char ($_^) but this behaviour is unspecified, so good to have this
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
More information about the latexrefman