[latex3-commits] [git/LaTeX3-latex3-latex2e] gh790: fix docu (a3521d30)

[Frank Mittelbach]

Repository : https://github.com/latex3/latex2e
On branch  : gh790
Link       : https://github.com/latex3/latex2e/commit/a3521d3000aab8338a517338ab05db27b7bfb33f

>---------------------------------------------------------------

commit a3521d3000aab8338a517338ab05db27b7bfb33f
Author: Frank Mittelbach <frank.mittelbach at latex-project.org>
Date:   Thu Mar 10 13:44:20 2022 +0100

    fix docu


>---------------------------------------------------------------

a3521d3000aab8338a517338ab05db27b7bfb33f
 base/ltbibl.dtx | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/base/ltbibl.dtx b/base/ltbibl.dtx
index da2974bd..4c219657 100644
--- a/base/ltbibl.dtx
+++ b/base/ltbibl.dtx
@@ -206,9 +206,9 @@
 \DeclareRobustCommand\cite{%
   \@ifnextchar [{\@tempswatrue\@citex at checkblank}{\@tempswafalse\@citex at checkblank[]}}
 %    \end{macrocode}
-%    Due to the \css{@for} as used in \cs{@citex} behaves and empty
-%    argument to \cs{cite} did not produce any Warning for a missing
-%    citation. So we inject a command before calling \cs{@citex} that
+%    Due to the way \cs{@for} as used in \cs{@citex} behaves an empty
+%    argument to \cs{cite} did not produce any warning for a missing
+%    citation. So we now inject a command before calling \cs{@citex} that
 %    does the checking for us. It is not done in \cs{@citex} directly,
 %    because that command is altered by a number of packages/classes
 %    and this way it is more likely that the check survives.