[latex3-commits] [git/LaTeX3-latex3-latex2e] copyedits-chris: More in lthooks.dtx (32968a12)
Chris Rowley
car222222 at github.github.io
Mon Sep 13 15:12:23 CEST 2021
Repository : https://github.com/latex3/latex2e
On branch : copyedits-chris
Link : https://github.com/latex3/latex2e/commit/32968a12ad1703b00baddff5af77dba4bd76798d
>---------------------------------------------------------------
commit 32968a12ad1703b00baddff5af77dba4bd76798d
Author: Chris Rowley <car222222 at users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon Sep 13 20:12:23 2021 +0700
More in lthooks.dtx
>---------------------------------------------------------------
32968a12ad1703b00baddff5af77dba4bd76798d
base/lthooks.dtx | 15 ++++++++-------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/base/lthooks.dtx b/base/lthooks.dtx
index 3969a2be..eb930d1e 100644
--- a/base/lthooks.dtx
+++ b/base/lthooks.dtx
@@ -959,13 +959,14 @@
% \begin{syntax}
% \cs{hook_activate_generic:n} \Arg{hook}
% \end{syntax}
-% Like \cs{hook_new:n} but does nothing if the hook was previously
-% declared with \cs{hook_new:n}. This declaration should only be used
-% in special situations, e.g., when a command of another package
-% needs to be altered and it is not clear if for that command a
-% generic \hook{cmd} hook was already explicitly declared before.
-%
-% Normally \cs{hook_new:n} should be used instead.
+% This is like \cs{hook_new:n} but it does nothing if the hook was previously
+% declared with \cs{hook_new:n}. This declaration should be used
+% only in special situations, e.g., when a command from another package
+% needs to be altered and it is not clear whether a
+% generic \hook{cmd} hook (for that command) has been previously
+% explicitly declared.
+%
+% Normally \cs{hook_new:n} should be used instead of this.
% \end{function}
%
%
More information about the latex3-commits
mailing list.