[latex3-commits] [git/LaTeX3-latex3-latex2e] copyedits-chris: More in lthooks.dtx (32968a12)

Chris Rowley car222222 at github.github.io
Mon Sep 13 15:12:23 CEST 2021


Repository : https://github.com/latex3/latex2e
On branch  : copyedits-chris
Link       : https://github.com/latex3/latex2e/commit/32968a12ad1703b00baddff5af77dba4bd76798d

>---------------------------------------------------------------

commit 32968a12ad1703b00baddff5af77dba4bd76798d
Author: Chris Rowley <car222222 at users.noreply.github.com>
Date:   Mon Sep 13 20:12:23 2021 +0700

    More in lthooks.dtx


>---------------------------------------------------------------

32968a12ad1703b00baddff5af77dba4bd76798d
 base/lthooks.dtx | 15 ++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/base/lthooks.dtx b/base/lthooks.dtx
index 3969a2be..eb930d1e 100644
--- a/base/lthooks.dtx
+++ b/base/lthooks.dtx
@@ -959,13 +959,14 @@
 %   \begin{syntax}
 %     \cs{hook_activate_generic:n} \Arg{hook}
 %   \end{syntax}
-%    Like \cs{hook_new:n} but does nothing if the hook was previously
-%    declared with \cs{hook_new:n}.  This declaration should only be used
-%    in special situations, e.g., when a command of another package
-%    needs to be altered and it is not clear if for that command a
-%    generic \hook{cmd} hook was already explicitly declared before.
-%
-%    Normally \cs{hook_new:n} should be used instead.
+%    This is like \cs{hook_new:n} but it does nothing if the hook was previously
+%    declared with \cs{hook_new:n}.  This declaration should be used
+%    only in special situations, e.g., when a command from another package
+%    needs to be altered and it is not clear whether a
+%    generic \hook{cmd} hook (for that command) has been previously 
+%    explicitly declared.
+%
+%    Normally \cs{hook_new:n} should be used instead of this.
 % \end{function}
 %
 %





More information about the latex3-commits mailing list.