[latex3-commits] [git/LaTeX3-latex3-latex2e] main: Sigh ... (9dbadd23)
Frank Mittelbach
frank.mittelbach at latex-project.org
Wed Jun 2 12:00:21 CEST 2021
Am 02.06.21 um 11:37 schrieb Joseph Wright:
> Repository : https://github.com/latex3/latex2e
> On branch : main
> Link : https://github.com/latex3/latex2e/commit/9dbadd2386e7db3e81aa2291ab09e4a54ae272c6
>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> commit 9dbadd2386e7db3e81aa2291ab09e4a54ae272c6
> Author: Joseph Wright <joseph.wright at morningstar2.co.uk>
> Date: Wed Jun 2 10:37:35 2021 +0100
>
> Sigh ...
>
>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> 9dbadd2386e7db3e81aa2291ab09e4a54ae272c6
> base/ltvers.dtx | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/base/ltvers.dtx b/base/ltvers.dtx
> index af0688b8..515f5afe 100644
> --- a/base/ltvers.dtx
> +++ b/base/ltvers.dtx
> @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@
> % intended to help us internally when we locally install a
> % format out of some development branch.
> % \begin{macrocode}
> -\edef\development at branch@name{develop \the\year-\the\month-\the\day}
> +\edef\development at branch@name{}
> % \end{macrocode}
> % \end{macro}
> % \end{macro}
>
>
>
couldn't we automate that? Logic is (I think): if patch-level is
negative then it contains the "develop ..." but if positive or 0 then it
should be empty. That check could be part of the code so it wouldn't
need changing
frank
More information about the latex3-commits
mailing list.