[latex3-commits] [git/LaTeX3-latex3-latex2e] main: Sigh ... (9dbadd23)

Frank Mittelbach frank.mittelbach at latex-project.org
Wed Jun 2 12:00:21 CEST 2021


Am 02.06.21 um 11:37 schrieb Joseph Wright:
> Repository : https://github.com/latex3/latex2e
> On branch  : main
> Link       : https://github.com/latex3/latex2e/commit/9dbadd2386e7db3e81aa2291ab09e4a54ae272c6
> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> commit 9dbadd2386e7db3e81aa2291ab09e4a54ae272c6
> Author: Joseph Wright <joseph.wright at morningstar2.co.uk>
> Date:   Wed Jun 2 10:37:35 2021 +0100
> 
>      Sigh ...
> 
> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 9dbadd2386e7db3e81aa2291ab09e4a54ae272c6
>   base/ltvers.dtx | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/base/ltvers.dtx b/base/ltvers.dtx
> index af0688b8..515f5afe 100644
> --- a/base/ltvers.dtx
> +++ b/base/ltvers.dtx
> @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@
>   %    intended to help us internally when we locally install a
>   %    format out of some development branch.
>   %    \begin{macrocode}
> -\edef\development at branch@name{develop \the\year-\the\month-\the\day}
> +\edef\development at branch@name{}
>   %    \end{macrocode}
>   % \end{macro}
>   % \end{macro}
> 
> 
> 

couldn't we automate that?  Logic is (I think): if patch-level is 
negative then it contains the "develop ..." but if positive or 0 then it 
should be empty. That check could be part of the code so it wouldn't 
need changing

frank


More information about the latex3-commits mailing list.