[latex3-commits] [git/LaTeX3-latex3-latex2e] lthooks-doc-updates: corrected a few typos adnd used US spelling in various places (c4790cfa)
Frank Mittelbach
frank.mittelbach at latex-project.org
Tue Jul 27 19:18:05 CEST 2021
Repository : https://github.com/latex3/latex2e
On branch : lthooks-doc-updates
Link : https://github.com/latex3/latex2e/commit/c4790cfa2caf8828a433a2e41463ecedf4f8f9a7
>---------------------------------------------------------------
commit c4790cfa2caf8828a433a2e41463ecedf4f8f9a7
Author: Frank Mittelbach <frank.mittelbach at latex-project.org>
Date: Tue Jul 27 19:18:05 2021 +0200
corrected a few typos adnd used US spelling in various places
>---------------------------------------------------------------
c4790cfa2caf8828a433a2e41463ecedf4f8f9a7
base/lthooks.dtx | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/base/lthooks.dtx b/base/lthooks.dtx
index d2ba16a9..9508dd8b 100644
--- a/base/lthooks.dtx
+++ b/base/lthooks.dtx
@@ -278,9 +278,9 @@
%
% Using \cs{UseOneTimeHook} several times with the same
% \Arg{hook} means that it only executes the first time, for
-% example, if used in a command that can be called several time
+% example, if used in a command that can be called several times
% then the hook executes only during the first invocation allowing
-% to use it as an \enquote{inizialization} hook.
+% to use it as an \enquote{initialization} hook.
%
% \fmi{Last statement is not yet implemented!}
%
@@ -395,12 +395,12 @@
% executed in the order in which it was declared.\footnotemark
%
% If this command is used with a one-time hook the code is only
-% ever used if we arebefore the hook execution, i.e., in contrast
+% ever used if we are before the hook execution, i.e., in contrast
% to \cs{AddToHook} the code is not executed immediately if the
-% hook execution already happened---in other words it truely
+% hook execution already happened---in other words it truly
% executes on the next invocation, only there is none in case of a
% one-time hook. This gives you a choice: should my code execute
-% always or should it only execute only at the point where the
+% always or should it execute only at the point where the
% one-time hook is used and not at all if this is impossible? For
% both there are use cases.
%
@@ -554,7 +554,7 @@
% Packages that provide their own package-like interfaces
% (Ti\textit{k}Z's \cs{usetikzlibrary}, for example) can use
% \cs{PushDefaultHookLabel} and \cs{PopDefaultHookLabel} to set
-% dedicated labels and emulate \cs{usepackage}-like hook behaviour
+% dedicated labels and emulate \cs{usepackage}-like hook behavior
% within those contexts.
%
% The |top-level| label is treated differently, and is reserved to the
@@ -2195,12 +2195,12 @@
% \item [@@_if_disabled:nTF] returns |false|.
% \end{itemize}
%
-% The allowed acctions are the same as in the \enquote{not
+% The allowed actions are the same as in the \enquote{not
% existing} state.
%
% \item[declared]
%
-% A hook is in this state it is not disabled and was explicity declared (e.g.,
+% A hook is in this state it is not disabled and was explicitly declared (e.g.,
% with \cs{NewHook}). In this case the four tests give the
% following results:
% \begin{itemize}
@@ -2359,7 +2359,7 @@
% (\cs[no-index]{g_@@_\meta{hook}_code_prop}) and the |top-level|
% and |next| token lists. A hook is initialized with
% \cs{@@_init_structure:n} the first time anything is added to it.
-% Inizializing a hook just with \cs{@@_init_structure:n} will not
+% Initializing a hook just with \cs{@@_init_structure:n} will not
% make it usable with \cs{hook_use:n}.
% \begin{macrocode}
\cs_new_protected:Npn \@@_init_structure:n #1
@@ -2690,7 +2690,7 @@
% \begin{macro}{\@@_normalize_hook_args:Nnn}
% \begin{macro}{\@@_normalize_hook_rule_args:Nnnnn}
% \begin{macro}{\@@_normalize_hook_args_aux:Nn}
-% Standard route for normalising hook and label arguments. The main
+% Standard route for normalizing hook and label arguments. The main
% macro does the entire operation within a group so that csnames made
% by \cs{@@_make_name:n} are wiped off before continuing. This means
% that this function cannot be used for \cs{hook_use:n}!
@@ -3149,7 +3149,7 @@
% for |top-level| because it is hard to reliably know that no code
% was added to \cs{@@_toplevel\textvisiblespace\meta{hook}} (granted that
% an empty code could be interpreted as that, but then it differs in
-% behaviour from other labels, in which an empty chunk is still valid
+% behavior from other labels, in which an empty chunk is still valid
% for removal). Besides, it doesn't make much (if any) sense for
% packages to remove |top-level| code. So here the chunk is just
% cleared unconditionally.
@@ -3951,7 +3951,7 @@
% \verb=#3= and carry on. We could do a little better and drop
% everything for that label since it doesn't matter where we sort
% in the empty code. However that would complicate the algorithm a
-% lot with little gain.\footnote{This also hase the advantage that
+% lot with little gain.\footnote{This also has the advantage that
% the result of the sorting doesn't change which might otherwise
% (for unrelated chunks) if we aren't careful.} So we still
% unnecessarily try to sort it in and depending on the rules that
@@ -4645,7 +4645,7 @@
{ Unknown~ relationship~ '#3'~
between~ labels~ '#2'~ and~ '#4'~
\str_if_eq:nnF {#1} {??} { ~in~hook~'#1' }. ~
- Perhaps~ a~ missspelling?
+ Perhaps~ a~ misspelling?
}
{
The~ relation~ used~ not~ known~ to~ the~ system.~ Allowed~ values~ are~
@@ -4951,7 +4951,7 @@
% \cs{usetikzlibrary} that are wrappers around \cs{input}, so they
% inherit the default label currently in force (usually |top-level|,
% but it may change if loaded in another package). To provide a
-% package-like behaviour also for hooks in these files, we provide
+% package-like behavior also for hooks in these files, we provide
% high-level access to the default label stack.
% \begin{macrocode}
\NewDocumentCommand \PushDefaultHookLabel { m }
@@ -5045,7 +5045,7 @@
% \begin{macro}[EXP]{\IfHookEmptyTF}
% Here we avoid the overhead of \pkg{xparse}, since \cs{IfHookEmptyTF}
% is used in \cs{end} (that is, every \LaTeX{} environment). As a
-% further optimisation, use \cs{let} rather than \cs{def} to avoid one
+% further optimization, use \cs{let} rather than \cs{def} to avoid one
% expansion step.
% \begin{macrocode}
\cs_new_eq:NN \IfHookEmptyTF \hook_if_empty:nTF
More information about the latex3-commits
mailing list.