[latex3-commits] [git/LaTeX3-latex3-mathtools] master: Quotation marks (a5f0c4c)

[GitHub]

Repository : https://github.com/latex3/mathtools
On branch  : master
Link       : https://github.com/latex3/mathtools/commit/a5f0c4ce27b0abd99c5de3a89851367c5c501758

>---------------------------------------------------------------

commit a5f0c4ce27b0abd99c5de3a89851367c5c501758
Author: Ivan Panchenko <39594356+ivan-pan at users.noreply.github.com>
Date:   Thu Aug 26 00:12:06 2021 +0200

    Quotation marks


>---------------------------------------------------------------

a5f0c4ce27b0abd99c5de3a89851367c5c501758
 mathtools.dtx | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mathtools.dtx b/mathtools.dtx
index af125f0..b5a5560 100644
--- a/mathtools.dtx
+++ b/mathtools.dtx
@@ -1634,7 +1634,7 @@ colorlinks,
 %                 & = g(x)
 % \end{align*}
 % One can have multiple boxes on each line, and the
-% >>\texttt{\textnormal{\&}}\quad right hand side<< can even be
+% ``\texttt{\textnormal{\&}}\quad right hand side'' can even be
 % missing. Here is an example of how the padding in the box can be changed.
 % \begin{verbatim}
 % \begin{align*}
@@ -1754,7 +1754,7 @@ colorlinks,
 %     & = d
 % \end{align*}
 % Thus \verb?\vdotswithin{=}? creates a box corresponding to
-% \verb?{}={}? and typesets a >>$\vdots$<< centered inside it. When
+% \verb?{}={}? and typesets a ``$\vdots$'' centered inside it. When
 % doing this as a normal line in an alignment leaves us with excessive
 % space which \verb?\shortvdotswithin{=}? takes care with for us.
 %
@@ -1990,7 +1990,7 @@ colorlinks,
 % {#1\,\delimsize\vert\,\mathopen{}#2\,\delimsize\vert\,\mathopen{}#3}
 % \end{verbatim}
 % \begin{itshape}
-%   Note the use of >>\verb|\mathopen{}|<< in the \meta{body} of
+%   Note the use of `\verb|\mathopen{}|' in the \meta{body} of
 %   \cs{braket}, this is very important when a scalable delimiter is
 %   being used and it does not present itself as a left or right
 %   delimiter. You will see why it is needed if you use
@@ -2101,7 +2101,7 @@ colorlinks,
 % \FeatureRequest{Barbara Beeton (on TSE)}{2013/10/07}
 % \cs{DeclarePairedDelimiterX} has an annoying caveat: it is very hard
 % to make a macro \verb|\lnorm{a}| that should result in $\lVert
-% a\rVert_2$.\footnote{The added >>\texttt{\_2}<< is hard to get around
+% a\rVert_2$.\footnote{The added `\texttt{\_2}' is hard to get around
 % the argument parsing.} 
 %
 % As a consequence we provide
@@ -2155,7 +2155,7 @@ colorlinks,
 %  auto scaled \cs{left} and \cs{right} fences behave as opening and
 %  closing fences, i.e.\ $\sin(x)$ vs. $\sin\left(x\right)$ (the later
 %  made via \verb|$\sin\left(x\right)$|), notice the gap between
-%  '$\sin$' and '('.  In some special cases it may be useful to be
+%  `$\sin$' and `('.  In some special cases it may be useful to be
 %  able to tinker with the behavior.
 %  \begin{codesyntax}
 %    \SpecialUsageIndex{\reDeclarePairedDelimiterInnerWrapper}
@@ -2450,7 +2450,7 @@ colorlinks,
 %  \verb|\(| (for an explanation see \cite{TBT}, section 4.3.3). We
 %  have changed Michael's original to accommodate one specific penalty
 %  construction: the \emph{tie}, i.e.,
-%  >>\verb|text~\(|<< will work as expected (as~of July, 2014).
+%  `\verb|text~\(|' will work as expected (as~of July, 2014).
 %
 %  \subsection{Left sub/superscripts}
 %