[l2h] How do I use an EPS in PDF and HTML?
Werner Arnhold
warnhold@zedat.fu-berlin.de
Mon, 02 Apr 2001 13:01:21 +0200
Dave Cole wrote:
>
> >>>>> "Herman" == Herman Bruyninckx <Herman.Bruyninckx@mech.kuleuven.ac.be> writes:
>
> Herman> On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
> >> > > \usepackage[pdftex]{graphicx}
> >> > > \usepackage[dvips]{graphicx}
> >>
> >> Is there a way to get things to work with both pdftex and dvips
> >> without changing the document? I want to be able to use both
> >> without changing the document.
>
> Herman> Just don't use these options :-) And if you say
>
> Herman> \includegraphics{myfile}
>
> Cool - that does work.
>
> Herman> Then DocBook is a good option! It is less complex than LaTeX,
> Herman> and copes with the problem you mention: all Linux
> Herman> documentation (on linuxdoc.org) is now standardized on
> Herman> DocBook!
>
> I did fiddle a bit with DocBook some time ago - I wrote some online
> help for a Gnome program (which I also wrote). DocBook is no picnic
> either.
I tried it too. I used the sgmltools package. I gave it up because of
several reasons:
- the package was no longer maintained because Kees de Groot got a
good job and had no
more time for it.
- the paper output (postscript) was, even though produced via TeX much
worse than it
could be,
- the way of handling special objects like math formulas is not
compareable with TeX
- for 10 lines of information you have to write 3-5 lines of tags. I'm
hacking very
quickly but this is nothing for someone who is slow in typing and
really impossible
for wysiwig fans,
- l2h does the same thing and the result is better. At the moment I
would reconcider
using DocBook when 1) the markup is more flexible and more easy to
extend and 2) if
I have a free DocBook/SGML-Editor. On behalf of markup TeX is simply
better!
Werner
--
Werner Arnhold
FU Berlin, FB 12, GEDIB
Arbeitsbereich Lehrerfortbildung und Informatische Bildung
Tel.: 030 / 838-56328, priv: 030 / 74 22 555