[fptex] Plans for the near future
Luis A Escobar
luis at lsu.edu
Thu Feb 24 12:40:32 CET 2005
LUK and Françoise: thank you for your input on this.
On the UNIX/LINUS side we use tetex here and we are happy with it.
On the Windows/DOS side my path was from PCTeX -> MikTeX -> fpTeX
I do not have fun memories of MikTeX but I have not revisited the
capabilities of MikTeX in many years. You should have noticied that I
did not use the word MikTeX in my original message (I tried to avoid that
word as much as I can). I have resisted the suggestions
here of switching back to MikTeX for several years. I have, however,
been distressed when some of the faculty and students here
have abandoned fpTeX in favor of MikTeX. I am going to keep
fpTeX in our Department for now and see what the future
brings. I hope it is something above and beyond fpTeX, I hate to
regress.
Thank again
Best regards, Luis A
LUK ShunTim <shuntim.luk at polyu.edu.hk>@tug.org on 02/24/2005 12:45:58 AM
Sent by: fptex-bounces at tug.org
To: fptex at tug.org
cc: (bcc: Luis A Escobar/luis/LSU)
Subject: Re: [fptex] Plans for the near future
Françoise - F&F Drs wrote:
> Luis A Escobar a écrit :
>
> >I would like to know what is the near future, say the next three
> >years, of fpTeX.
>
> Pessimistic : ite missa est : http://www.tug.org/protext/
>
Hello Françoise and Luis,
Protex is miktex. :-) I switched, a long time ago, from miktex to fptex
because config problems could be more easily solved by tweaking the
config files; more tetex like. I don't know the situation now as I've
not gone back to miktex since.
> Optimistic : alleluia : http://www.fptex.org/xemtex/
I read recently on the texlive list it's more inclined towards to
spitting out PDF.
>
> As you like.
>
> --
> FMF
Yes, I share the sentiments of Luis.
Regards,
ST
--
_______________________________________________
fptex mailing list
fptex at tug.org
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/fptex
More information about the fptex
mailing list