[texhax] TeX books, was Re: question about \if
James Quirk
jjq at galcit.caltech.edu
Sat Dec 4 20:31:56 CET 2010
Phil,
On Sat, 4 Dec 2010, Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
>
>
> Uwe Lueck wrote:
>
> > Great! Now: can you write down the equations
> > describing the interaction of electrons with TeX
> > that leads to this difference between the printed
> > an the electronic version ?
>
> Yes. Well, that is to say, I have discovered a truly
> remarkable proof which this message is too small to contain.
Please take a look at:
http://www.amrita-cfd.org/tex-group/blind-pew.pdf
and you'll see that "Fermat's Gambit" no longer applies.
So please pass across your remarkable proof and I'll be
more than happy to squeeze it into your original posting. :-)
Cheers,
James
>
> ** Phil.
> _______________________________________________
> TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
> Mailing list archives: http://tug.org/pipermail/texhax/
> More links: http://tug.org/begin.html
>
> Automated subscription management: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/texhax
> Human mailing list managers: postmaster at tug.org
>
>
More information about the texhax
mailing list