[texhax] Plain TeX: shorter `rightarrow' needed
Rodolfo Medina
rodolfo.medina at gmail.com
Mon Feb 9 00:19:23 CET 2009
On 8 February 2009 Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>> > In order to denote an oriented $\Gamma$ line, I need to put a small
>> > rightarrow over the $\Gamma$ symbol, such that the plain TeX
>> > $\rightarrow$ is too long.
>> >
>> > Is there a way to get that, and how?
Uwe Lück <uwe.lueck at web.de> writes:
>>\vec{\Gamma}
At 21:05 08.02.09, Reinhard Kotucha wrote:
> "Missing $ inserted", otherwise I don't like that the arrow is italic while
> Gamma is not. $\mathit{\vec{\Gamma}}$ and
> $\mathop{\Gamma}^{\scriptscriptstyle\to}$ are bad as well. Placing
> something on top of a capital letter is problematic in general. Note that
> in (classical) Greek, diacritical marks are not set on top of capital
> letters, but on their left (learnt this from Claudio Beccari, cf. my
> http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Räter), or already that limits of sum or
> integral symbols are set on their right in inline mode. What is the
> convention in this field?
$\vbox{\ialign{#\crcr$\scriptscriptstyle\to$\crcr\noalign
{\kern.5pt\nointerlineskip}%
$\hfil\displaystyle{\Gamma}\hfil$\crcr}}$
(see definition of \overerightarrow in the TeXbook) looks very nice.
Rodolfo
More information about the texhax
mailing list