[texhax] TeX Frequently Asked Questions -- question label "gethelp"
Oleg Katsitadze
olegkat at gmail.com
Sat May 3 07:35:18 CEST 2008
Hi Steffen,
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 09:50:10AM +0100, Steffen van Bakel wrote:
> how can you automatically generate
> recursive structures that you want to match against (in the functional
> programming style) if not by using \bgroup and \egroup?
I'm not sure what you mean. Why not use { and } ? Can you provide an
example of what you want to achieve?
> And they are both
> 'let' to { and } ... but I understand they are not the same.
Yes, for argument delimiters, TeX searches for the tokens { and }
(with respective category codes, of course).
> Can you suggest a way around this?
Maybe, if I can understand what you want :).
> What's puzzling me is that even the last alternative goes wrong. Following
> your argument, should TeX not complain about the missing "\end{mygroup}"
> when it closes on the first ")"?
Not really. "\end{mygroup}" is not even a primitive, so TeX does not
give it any special treatment -- as far as TeX cares, it's just some
control sequence.
Best,
Oleg
More information about the texhax
mailing list