[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: psnfss and lw35nfss
Concernant « Re: psnfss and lw35nfss », Sebastian Rahtz écrit :
> > Furthermore, I think, that TeXtures and Y&Y don't have the right to block a
> > possible progress. It can be done with dvips, and it should be done. I am
> i dont entirely agree. solutions should not depend on idiosyncracies
> of one driver
Well, concerning lw35nfss, as these will be the reference vf/tfm's
available for download on CTAN they should be as widely
compatible/portable as TeX is, no?
Having documented (optionnal?) support for dotless j's in the tools would be nice
Thierry Bouche. ----- email@example.com
PS I personnally agree with the idea that inexistant charachters
should be really inexistant. The only thing this could break is font
tables, isn't it?