[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: psnfss and lw35nfss

To: yannis@null.net
Subject: Re: psnfss and lw35nfss
From: Sebastian Rahtz <s.rahtz@elsevier.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 1997 11:15:08 GMT
Cc: KNAPPEN@vkpmzd.kph.uni-mainz.de, tex-font@math.utah.edu
Flags: 000000000000
In-Reply-To: <199702031107.GAA09755@babe.globecomm.net>
References: <199702031107.GAA09755@babe.globecomm.net>

Yannis Haralambous writes:
 > >esperanto?! i rest my case.... cant you think of a better reason?
 > Unicode 0135 LATIN SMALL LETTER J WITH CIRCUMFLEX,
 > 01F0 LATIN SMALL LETTER J WITH CARON

Sorry, Yannis, i meant i wanted a real-world reason for having to have
dotless j faked in all fonts. i can think of airy-fairy academic
reasons for myself....

The bottom line, as Thierry pointed out to me, is that Bernard's
method is not demonstrated to be portable to eg Textures, so i think
we have to hold off on it for now

Sebastian

References:
- Re: psnfss and lw35nfss
  - From: Yannis Haralambous <yannis@null.net>

Prev by Date: Re: psnfss and lw35nfss
Next by Date: Re: psnfss and lw35nfss
Prev by thread: Re: psnfss and lw35nfss
Next by thread: Re: psnfss and lw35nfss
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread