Re: psnfss and lw35nfss

[Sebastian Rahtz <s.rahtz@elsevier.co.uk>]

KNAPPEN@vkpmzd.kph.uni-mainz.de writes:
 > I think, having a dotless j is vital. It has been in the standadr TeX glyph 
 > set for 15 years, and I need it from time to time to typeset some text in 
 > esperanto.
esperanto?! i rest my case.... cant you think of a better reason?

 > I also think (though not with the same strong affection) that glyphs which 
 > cannot be faked with resonable effort (like the letter eng, or the 
 > perthousandzero) should be completely absent from the tfm file and not 
 > point to black boxen. The rationale behind this is, that the error should 
 > occur at TeX run time and not as late as proofreading time.
i could agree with this. what do others think?

sebastian