[XeTeX] XeTeX documentation "initiative"

[Apostolos Syropoulos]

>greatly diminished. OpenType Math is still in a very early stage in XeTeX and 
>has so many bugs that it is not ready for production use. 

I think this is a wrong statement: OpenType Math is by itself in early stage. 
Only
two-three products make use of it. 


> - Of course ConTeXt mustn't be ignored. ConTeXt Mk  IV, which is based on 
>LuaTeX, 
>
> seems to have everything that is missing from  LaTeX: a stable, coherent 
>interface, a well-designed 
>
> architecture that makes  LaTeX-style hacking and package clashes unnecessary, 
>XML support, 
>
> micro-typography, OpenType math, and much more. 

Even if this true, why so few people use ConTeXt? IMHO, ConTeXt is more 
difficult to learn and use
than LaTeX. In a final analysis, you cannot force people to use something just 
because you
think it is better. You have to convince them and so far it seems they are not.

A.S.


----------------------
Apostolos Syropoulos
Xanthi, Greece