[XeTeX] Ligatures no tproberly rendered in Gillius ADF Condensed

Peter Dyballa Peter_Dyballa at Web.DE
Sat Dec 4 18:29:51 CET 2010


Am 04.12.2010 um 17:40 schrieb Joachim Trinkwitz:

> Because you use a certain tool, it is more correct than other  
> people's? Isn't this a rather silly statement? Well, if you think  
> Linotypes font manager is lying on me, then you know better, I  
> suppose ... (even the fact that several tools shows different  
> results, should make you think about the quality of the font).


FontForge shows seven different ligatures in the range of U+FB00-U 
+FB06 (f_f, f_i, f_l, f_f_i, f_f_l, longs_t, s_t)... Regular, Italic,  
Cond – in CondItalic f_f, f_f_i, f_f_l, longs_t, s_t are blank though  
the font claims that they're there.

--
Mit friedvollen Grüßen

   Pete

Es gibt 10 Sorten Leute: solche, die binär verstehen, und solche, die  
es nicht verstehen.




More information about the XeTeX mailing list