[tlbuild] Testing cxx-runtime-hack -- V 1.1 (freebsd 64bit)

[Tim Arnold]

results for:
ELF 64-bit LSB executable, AMD x86-64, version 1 (FreeBSD), for FreeBSD 6.3, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped
================================================
WITH hack:
cc-test-am:
        libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x800631000)
cc-test-am-lt:
        libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x800631000)
cc-test-lt:
        libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x800631000)
cc-test-plain:
        libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x800631000)
cxx-test-am:
        libm.so.4 => /lib/libm.so.4 (0x800694000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x8007b0000)
cxx-test-am-lt:
        libm.so.4 => /lib/libm.so.4 (0x800694000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x8007b0000)
cxx-test-lt:
        libm.so.4 => /lib/libm.so.4 (0x800694000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x8007b0000)
cxx-test-plain:
        libm.so.4 => /lib/libm.so.4 (0x800694000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x8007b0000)
================================================
WITHOUT hack:
cc-test-am:
        libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x800631000)
cc-test-am-lt:
        libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x800631000)
cc-test-lt:
        libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x800631000)
cc-test-plain:
        libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x800631000)
cxx-test-am:
        libstdc++.so.5 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 (0x800631000)
        libm.so.4 => /lib/libm.so.4 (0x800828000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x800944000)
cxx-test-am-lt:
        libstdc++.so.5 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 (0x800631000)
        libm.so.4 => /lib/libm.so.4 (0x800828000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x800944000)
cxx-test-lt:
        libstdc++.so.5 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 (0x800631000)
        libm.so.4 => /lib/libm.so.4 (0x800828000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x800944000)
cxx-test-plain:
        libstdc++.so.5 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 (0x800631000)
        libm.so.4 => /lib/libm.so.4 (0x800828000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x800944000)
================================================
--Tim 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tlbuild-bounces at tug.org [mailto:tlbuild-bounces at tug.org] On Behalf Of
> Peter Breitenlohner
> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 11:08 AM
> To: TLbuilders
> Cc: Karl Berry
> Subject: [tlbuild] Testing cxx-runtime-hack -- V 1.1
> 
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Karl Berry wrote:
> 
> >    Can you please forward the tarball to everyone doing a binary build
> >    for such systems and ask them to test this new cxx-runtime-hack
> >    mechanism (ASAP).
> >
> > I mailed tlbuild at tug.org with it.
> 
> Dear TL builders,
> 
> a few days ago Karl Berry forwarded to you a small package cxx-test-1.0.
> 
> The purpose was, to test a new mechanism to link C++ programs with a static
> libstdc++ in such a way that one can still use libtool.
> 
> It is important to test this new mechanism as soon as possible on all
> different types of build systems, in order to avoid problems later on near
> the TL 2009 release date.
> 
> Unfortunately, that first version had problems when using additional
> (uninstalled or system) libraries.
> 
> There is now a new version 1.1 available from
>  	ftp://ftpth.mppmu.mpg.de/pub/peb/TLtests/cxx-test-1.1.tar.bz2
>  	ftp://ftpth.mppmu.mpg.de/pub/peb/TLtests/cxx-test-1.1.tar.gz
> 
> I have tested this for
> 
>  	arch		compiler	cxx-test-1.1 result
> 
>  	i386-linux	gcc-3.4.6	static and shared OK
>  	x86_64-linux	gcc-3.4.6	static and shared OK
> 
> and would appreciate to obtain feedback (on this list) for as many different
> build systems as possible, most important for those that will be used for
> the TL binary build.  There is a README with detailed instructions.
> 
> Regards
> Peter Breitenlohner <peb at mppmu.mpg.de>