[texworks] Call for Help: Proofreading the manual
warrence.stm at gmx.de
Thu Mar 3 11:29:06 CET 2011
I think it would be reasonable to write "Con\TeX t" instead of "ConTeXt"
in the introduction.
On 02.03.2011 21:41, Stefan Löffler wrote:
> as announced earlier, I've been updating and revamping the manual a bit
> for the upcoming 0.4 release.
> Attached are the html and pdf versions (no sources yet, until the
> license issue is resolved). Please have a look at it, and tell me what
> you think. Is something unclear? Is something missing? Do you have any
> other comments or suggestions?
> Also, if some people could read it and point out typos, wrong grammar,
> etc, I would be very grateful.
> Thanks in advance,
More information about the texworks