[texhax] Achieving the optimum quality of rendering
news3 at nililand.de
Wed Mar 5 09:43:01 CET 2014
Am Wed, 5 Mar 2014 01:00:14 +0100 schrieb Reinhard Kotucha:
> > >> In the final version, I would like the best possible quality of
> > >> rendering and I believe that to be a pdf file.
> > > For the final version I recommend to run latexmk. Don't know
> > > whether latexmk is provided by MiKTeX, but you aren't forced to
> > > use MiKTeX.
> > latexmk is in miktex but you probably need an external perl to run
> > it. But I fail to see what impact latexmk should have on the
> > quality of the pdf output.
> Ulrike, you only cited a tiny part of Keith's mail. And it was too
> late last night to answer his question more thoroughly.
I cited the part you cited ;-).
> Well, it has no impact on quality, of course. However, I don't
> think that two latex runs are enough, as Keith probably assumed,
> especially if a bibliography and/or index is needed.
I only wanted to avoid that Keith gets the impression that your
advice was an answer to his question about quality.
More information about the texhax