[OS X TeX] Re: MacOSX-TeX Digest, Vol 11, Issue 17

Tim Lahey tim.lahey at gmail.com
Wed Sep 17 21:07:00 CEST 2008


I'll take a look at glosstex as well. I'm not sure which is the better
choice yet. It appears that they both support multiple glossaries,
but it isn't entirely clear what is the best way to do it since the
docs aren't clear on that aspect of things.

glosstex has a slight problem compiling, but with minor edits
I got it to compile, I hope that doesn't affect the program.



On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 3:00 PM,  <macosx-tex-request at email.esm.psu.edu> wrote:
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 21:31:56 +0100 (BST)
> From: cfrees at imapmail.org
> Subject: Re: [OS X TeX] Re: Multiple nomencl per document?
> To: TeX on Mac OS X Mailing List <macosx-tex at email.esm.psu.edu>
> Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.1.10.0809162130241.23192 at cyfrifiadurcfr.local>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
> I found glosstex very useful for including multiple glossaries, so you
> might look at that, too. I'm not in a position to compare with the
> glossaries package, though, as I've not used it.
> - cfr
----------- Please Consult the Following Before Posting -----------
TeX FAQ: http://www.tex.ac.uk/faq
List Reminders and Etiquette: http://www.esm.psu.edu/mac-tex/list/
List Archive: http://tug.org/pipermail/macostex-archives/
TeX on Mac OS X Website: http://mactex-wiki.tug.org/
List Info: http://email.esm.psu.edu/mailman/listinfo/macosx-tex

More information about the macostex-archives mailing list