[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: comments on 0.58
- To: clasen@pong.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de
- Subject: Re: comments on 0.58
- From: Ulrik Vieth <vieth@thphy.uni-duesseldorf.de>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jan 1998 11:23:51 +0100
- Cc: math-font-discuss@cogs.susx.ac.uk
>> General:
>>
>> - The raised radical in MC seems to be raised a little too
>> much compared with the delimiters. If its height is 10pt,
>> should it be 8.5pt above the baselien and 1.5pt below?
>> (The placement seems to be better in the bold version.)
> Well, I didn't think about that very long, I just raised them
> to the baseline (ie depth = 0), since I didn't know any better.
> The question here is, I think, if non-TeX software might have
> any special expectations about the positioning of the radical
> glyph.
Presumably positioned similarly as the textstyle delimiters
>> - slot 130 (`EXT') in MSP presumably should be marked as
>> a controlglyph rather than a missingglyph (or not at all)?
> You mean the EXT in the arrowkit?
Yes, the arrowkit. There's one invisible control glyph, which
is marked as missing. It could have been slot 129 as well.
Cheers, Ulrik.