[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Separate encoding for \log etc
- To: math-font-discuss@cogs.susx.ac.uk
- Subject: Separate encoding for \log etc
- From: jeremy@cs.aukuni.ac.nz (Jeremy Gibbons)
- Date: 22 Aug 1993 16:38:27 +1200
> \section{The base: a Cork encoded text font}
>
> Main use: things like \texttt{\string\log}. This would generably be a
> Latin font.
>
[...]
>
> \textbf{Separating this set from the rest,} enables the user to
> have `log' and `sin', etc typeset in many different ways. Thus the
> multiletter operators can by compatible with the text font, or
> with the rest of the math glyphs, or even set in yet another font.
>
> \note {this font is not for typesetting words. That must be done in
> text mode.}
I think I missed something here. Why do we want a separate encoding from
the text encodings for things like \log etc? They *are* words! Imho (though
this is not the topic of MFD) \log etc should be set in a text
font---family zero if the designer so decides, or perhaps some other
family, but a text family nonetheless.
Jeremy
- References:
- No Subject
- From: Justin Ziegler <ziegler@goofy.ZDV.UNI-Mainz.DE>