[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: horizontal curly braces.
- To: math-font-discuss@cogs.susx.ac.uk
- Subject: Re: horizontal curly braces.
- From: alanje@cogs.susx.ac.uk (Alan Jeffrey)
- Date: Tue, 17 Aug 93 17:24 BST
>by the way, when considering whether to use rules
>for extenders or small pieces, take into account that the rule
>approach yields lengths that exactly match the material being
>braced, while pieces will yield only an approximation.
In the case of \overbrace and \underbrace you can use leaders to fill
the material precisely, in a similar fashion to \rightarrowfill. An
appropriate definition would be something like (er, codes off the top
of his head):
\def\downbracefill{$\m@th\braceld
\braceextd\mkern-\braceextwidth
\cleaders\hbox{\braceextd}\hfill
\mkern-\braceextwidth\braceextd
\bracemidd
\braceextd\mkern-\braceextwidth
\leaders\hbox{\braceextd}\hfill
\mkern-\braceextwidth\braceextd
\bracerd$}
This definition works, as long as the uses of \overbrace{foo} are when
foo is wider than the width of
\braceld\braceextd\bracemidd\braceextd\bracerd. The problem with
extension pieces is when that's not the case...
Alan.