[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More on subscripts and superscripts
- To: math-font-discuss@cogs.susx.ac.uk
- Subject: Re: More on subscripts and superscripts
- From: alanje@cogs.susx.ac.uk (Alan Jeffrey)
- Date: Wed, 11 Aug 93 17:55 BST
>(?) _ in math mode can only be subscript OR \_, but not both. If _ is
>made `active' via mathcode "8000, it will work all right inside a
>\write (or conversely, it will only break where it would have broken
>before). But generally, I agree with your next words:
I was worried about things like:
\catcode`\_=\active
blah_blah $blah_blah \hbox{blah_blah} blah_blah$ blah_blah
inside an \edef or \write. Just thinking about all the ways that
these sorts of macros can go wrong gives me the shivers!
>Agreed, except I would have put it the other way around: the decision
>to use syntax like {...\over...} for \over and friends was the design
>flaw that necessitated all the jury-rigging around \mathchoice and
>made it difficult to provide a current math style variable.
Absolutely. I still have no idea why DEK adopted that syntax for
\over and friends. Oh well...
Alan.