[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More on subscripts and superscripts
- To: alanje@cogs.susx.ac.uk
- Subject: Re: More on subscripts and superscripts
- From: bbeeton <BNB@MATH.AMS.ORG>
- Date: 10 Aug 1993 10:46:52 -0400 (EDT)
- Cc: math-font-discuss@cogs.susx.ac.uk
alan, regarding negated arrows, says he wasn't as clear as he
could have been. but alan, i didn't misunderstand. i did read
this as saying you would make all the arrows available -- but
as composites. and my response, also not as clear as it might
have been, should be read as meaning ``symbols were put into the
ms*m fonts because combining pieces didn't result in the quality
and reliability that we needed, and therefore whole symbols were
created.''
-- bb