[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SYMBOLS - operators
- To: math-font-discuss@cogs.susx.ac.uk
- Subject: Re: SYMBOLS - operators
- From: alanje@cogs.susx.ac.uk (Alan Jeffrey)
- Date: Fri, 6 Aug 93 13:25 BST
>The question is some have three sizes, and some have two sizes. I feel
>like making them all three sizes. What do you think ?
I'd recommend that anything that has a large variant <bigFOO> should
also have a small variant <FOO>, but not necessarily vice versa. The
following binary operators from cmsy and ms*m don't have large
variants (at least I've never seen them!):
\pm, \mp, \setminus, \cdot, \times, \ast, \star, \diamond, \circ,
\bullet, \div, \triangleleft, \triangleright, \wr, \bigcirc,
\dagger, \ddagger, \bigtriangleup, \bigtriangledown,
\blacktriangleup, \blacktriangledown, \circledR, \circledS
The following are questionable:
\ominus, \oslash, \odot, \triangleup, \triangledown,
\curlyvee, \curlywedge, \Cup, \Cap, all the \boxFOO operators
\sqcap, \parallel, \interleave, \oblong and \dijkstrachoice(these last
three from St Mary's Road) all have large variants.
Alan.