[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
No Subject
- To: math-font-discuss@cogs.susx.ac.uk
- From: Justin Ziegler <ziegler@goofy.zdv.uni-mainz.de>
- Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1993 10:21:54 -0000
------- Forwarded Message
Return-Path: karl@cs.umb.edu
Received: by goofy.zdv.uni-mainz.de with SMTP ; Fri, 6 Aug 1993 00:01:11 +0200
Received: by terminus.cs.umb.edu id AA10159
(5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for ziegler@goofy.zdv.uni-mainz.de); Thu, 5 Aug 1993 18:00:19 -0400
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 1993 18:00:19 -0400
>From: Karl Berry <karl@cs.umb.edu>
Message-Id: <199308052200.AA10159@terminus.cs.umb.edu>
To: ziegler@goofy
In-Reply-To: Justin Ziegler's message of Tue, 03 Aug 1993 11:08:50 -0000 <9308030908.AA09321@goofy.zdv.uni-mainz.de>
Subject: FONT DIMENS for new math encodings
Reply-To: karl@cs.umb.edu
\item The disign size,
\item The default script size,
\item The default scriptscript size,
\item suggested value for mathsurround (in MC)
\item math\_axis (in every font)
\end{itemize}
What would you think if we included values of thin, thick and med mu skip ?
Those all sound good to me.
In addition, I'd include the recommended rule weight and baselineskip
(as two fontdimens, one for leadingheight and one for leadingdepth).
------- End of Forwarded Message