[XeTeX] The arcs package
Wilfred van Rooijen
wvanrooijen at yahoo.com
Fri Mar 16 13:54:28 CET 2018
You should "adopt" the package and become the new maintainer, perhaps.
Wilfred
On Friday, March 16, 2018 7:33 PM, Arash Zeini <arash.zeini at gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Everyone,
A couple of years ago, I raised an issue I had encountered with the arcs package (see below for the complete run of messages). A solution was proposed by Michael Sharpe and Joseph Wright wrote that he would mention the issue on c.t.t., as messages to arcs' author bounced. The solution, which I add manually to arcs.sty is:
"The arcs package depends on the relsize package which did change a few months ago in a way that requires a small change in the arcs package. You need to add the line (just after \RequirePackage{relsize} is a good place}
\long\def \@gobblethree #1#2#3{}
and then change the line
\let \rs at size@warning = \@gobbletwo
to
\let \rs at size@warning = \@gobblethree
because, in relsize.sty, the macro \rs at size@warning is now defined to have three arguments, the last of which (6.0pt) was being left as printable text. This problem is a LaTeX issue and has nothing particular to XeTeX."
The arcs package was never updated and the issue persists. Is there anyway these changes could be incorporated into arcs.sty? I use arcs quite often and it would be a great help if the changes could become part of the code.
Many thanks and best wishes,
Arash
On 26 August 2013 at 17:25, Arash Zeini <arash.zeini at gmail.com> wrote:
Thank you, all, for your feedback. I can wait for the fix to be applied.
Joseph: if you hear anything, could you please post it here?
Many thanks and best wishes,Arash
On 25 August 2013 16:02, Joseph Wright <joseph.wright at morningstar2. co.uk> wrote:
On 25/08/2013 16:00, Joseph Wright wrote:
> Nothing to do with XeTeX: it's due to relsize and shows up with a demo
> for pdfTeX. Inside arcs.sty you find
>
> \let \rs at size@warning = \@gobbletwo
> \relsize{-10}%
>
> but in the latest relsize (dated 2013-03-29) \rs at size@warning takes
> three arguments. Thus arcs needs adjusting (probaly should just leave
> the relsize code alone): I've CC'd the arcs author.
Message to the arcs author bounced. I'll raise this on c.t.t.: the
package is LPPL so a change can be sorted out if he can't be found.
--
Joseph Wright
------------------------------ --------------------
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/ listinfo/xetex
--------------------------------------------------
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://tug.org/pipermail/xetex/attachments/20180316/7c129066/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the XeTeX
mailing list