[XeTeX] Hyphenation of strings of more than 63 characters

Zdenek Wagner zdenek.wagner at gmail.com
Wed Mar 16 00:37:30 CET 2016


2016-03-16 0:06 GMT+01:00 Jonathan Kew <jfkthame at gmail.com>:

> On 15/3/16 18:04, Doug McKenna wrote:
>
>> There could be some subtle problems that simply changing the character
>> count constant causes.
>>
>> In particular, the allocation size of a "whatsit" language node might
>> also need changing, which would require adjusting other code in the core
>> engine that assumes a default small size for that language node sub-type of
>> a "whatsit".
>>
>> Or not.  I can't tell from the TeX source what the bit sizes of these
>> node fields are.  But if they're too small to fit a pair of enhanced
>> character count limits for hyphenation, there will likely be bugs elsewhere
>> due to truncation or wraparound in the arithmetic.
>>
>> FWIW,
>>
>> Doug McKenna
>>
>>
>
> AFAICS, this would only become an issue if we allow \lefthyphenmin and
> \righthyphenmin to be given larger values; currently, they're limited to
> the range 0..63 (actually, it's possible to set the parameters to larger
> values, but they'll be clamped when stored in a language node).
>
> But I don't think that's needed here; surely there's no realistic use-case
> that requires setting the *-min values greater than 63, even when
> hyphenating 1000-letter Sanskrit words.


The contrary is true. These long strings are not single words, several
words are glued together. For instance, Bhagavdgita contains श्रीभगवानुवाच
which are in fact three words श्री भगवान् उवाच. It makes no sense to
increase values of \lefthyphenmin and \righthyphenmin.

>
>
> JK
>
>
>

Zdeněk Wagner
http://ttsm.icpf.cas.cz/team/wagner.shtml
http://icebearsoft.euweb.cz



>
> --------------------------------------------------
> Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
>  http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://tug.org/pipermail/xetex/attachments/20160316/1d10f7a6/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the XeTeX mailing list