[XeTeX] DVIasm

Philip Taylor P.Taylor at Rhul.Ac.Uk
Mon Feb 8 23:31:58 CET 2016

Thank you, Bruno.  I confess I speak not a word of Python, so my
suggested changes were pure guesswork.  Thank you very much for
suggesting the proper replacements.

Philip Taylor
Bruno Le Floch wrote:

> 512 doesn't look like the right number (in Python 2, 012345 is octal
> 12345, not binary).  It may be better to use 0o1000000000 which seems
> to work in both Python 2 and 3.
> Bruno

More information about the XeTeX mailing list