P.Taylor at Rhul.Ac.Uk
Mon Feb 8 23:31:58 CET 2016
Thank you, Bruno. I confess I speak not a word of Python, so my
suggested changes were pure guesswork. Thank you very much for
suggesting the proper replacements.
Bruno Le Floch wrote:
> 512 doesn't look like the right number (in Python 2, 012345 is octal
> 12345, not binary). It may be better to use 0o1000000000 which seems
> to work in both Python 2 and 3.
More information about the XeTeX