[XeTeX] additional beginL endL nodes in math

Arthur Reutenauer arthur.reutenauer at normalesup.org
Wed Apr 15 23:01:22 CEST 2015

> Fair enough.  My thought was simply that if a sufficiently large number
> of users are dependent (even tacitly) on the current behaviour, then
> opting-in to the new should not be out of the question ...

  That's the eternal question, isn't it - to which extend should a buggy
behaviour be preserved for backward compatibility?  In this case I'm
rather glad that Khaled didn't hesitate to break said compatibility.


More information about the XeTeX mailing list