[XeTeX] rendering of U+0903
Zdenek Wagner
zdenek.wagner at gmail.com
Tue Apr 14 15:33:00 CEST 2015
2015-04-14 15:17 GMT+02:00 Arthur Reutenauer <
arthur.reutenauer at normalesup.org>:
> > The problem is that AFAIK the Indic scripts are not yet implemented in
> > luatex.
>
> Actually it is, at least for Devanagari. This is fairly recent (2-3
> years).
>
I did not know about it, I asked Hans Hagen when preparing this book:
http://icebearsoft.euweb.cz/bharat.php
>
> > The dotted ring is not a part of the glyph. the Unicode shaper
> > (HarfBuzz in XeTeX) knows that visarga is a dependent vowel (matra) and
> > since a consonant is missing, it takes the dotted ring from the font (it
> > should exist as a glyph per Microsoft's recommendation).
>
> That's interesting, thanks for the explanation. But Manfred doesn't
> want LuaTeX to produce the same output as XeTeX, he wants it the other
> way round. What you're saying implies that it's not really possible
> with a conformant font.
>
> > I have quite a lot of texts in Hindi, if you develop such a shaper in
> lua,
> > I can offer testing.
>
I think it is rather a matter of a shaper. The dotted ring should be
present in the font and the shaper should place it instead of the missing
consonant. I understand the display of a single matra without anything
added is important in textbooks.
>
> You should get in touch with Hans and others on the ConTeXt list.
>
> Arthur
>
>
Zdeněk Wagner
http://hroch486.icpf.cas.cz/wagner/
http://icebearsoft.euweb.cz
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://tug.org/pipermail/xetex/attachments/20150414/243544e8/attachment.html>
More information about the XeTeX
mailing list