[XeTeX] xetex and the unicode bidirectional algorithm.

Georg Duffner g.duffner at gmail.com
Sat Dec 7 11:43:25 CET 2013


Am 07.12.2013 01:28, schrieb Dominik Wujastyk:
> I'm sensing, I think, that you don't like that font, Khaled?
>
> Dominik :-)

He’s not alone and the Arabic is not the only problem...

Georg

>
> 2013/12/5 Khaled Hosny <khaledhosny at eglug.org>:
>>
>
>
>>>>> Please, please, please, never ever use GNU free font for Arabic; it is
>>>>> the most hideous, crappy and useless un-Arabic font ever created, my
>>>>> blood boils every time I see it in use.
>>>>>
>>>> Could you summarize what is wrong and report it?
>>>
>>> All of it, the Arabic range is utter crap.
>>>
>>>> Steve White will
>>>> certainly fix it (unless it is better toreplace the whole Arabic
>>>> block).
>>>
>>> I did, and even offered to work on replacement, but the offer was turned
>>> down.
>>>
>>>> I see problems with dochachmee he, Urdu words as بھآرت and ؔٹھیک are
>>>> not displayed properly.
>>>
>>> There is no point in looking at the microlevel, the whole thing is
>>> worthless garbage and should be tossed in the nearest trash bin. Whoever
>>> designed it has absolutely no idea about Arabic and its design, I take
>>> it personally and find this garbage an insult to the Arabic script. Show
>>> a text typeset with it to an Urdu speaker and he is likely to vomit in
>>> disgust.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
>    http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
>


-- 
EB Garamond: http://www.georgduffner.at/ebgaramond


More information about the XeTeX mailing list