[XeTeX] XeTeX 0.9999.2 released
zdenek.wagner at gmail.com
Sat Apr 13 13:12:50 CEST 2013
2013/4/13 Khaled Hosny <khaledhosny at eglug.org>:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:32:47AM +0200, Zdenek Wagner wrote:
>> 2013/4/9 Khaled Hosny <khaledhosny at eglug.org>:
>> > On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 04:37:19PM +0200, Zdenek Wagner wrote:
>> >> 2013/4/9 Khaled Hosny <khaledhosny at eglug.org>:
>> >> > Hi Zdenek,
>> >> >
>> >> > For all the failing tests I get the same output from Uniscribe as from
>> >> > HarfBuzz and the new XeTeX, as such I believe those are font bugs. The
>> >> > difference is probably because the font now contains version 2 Indic features
>> >> > which HarfBuzz will always use (there is no way to tell HarfBuzz to use
>> >> > the old features if the new ones are present).
>> >> >
>> >> Thanks for your effort. Steve White tried HTML version of these tests
>> >> in Windows Vista and FreeFont worked there (he sent me the
>> >> screenshot). Anyway, your build fails even with FreeFont 20120503
>> >> (distributed with TL2012) and if I remember well, it does not have
>> >> version 2 features (but maybe my memory is wrong).
>> > I need his test files then.
>> I do not have his exact files but the attached file contains his
>> screenshot. I have typed the text in HTML, you just have to add a CSS
>> defining the font to be used.
> I'm not sure I follow, but the output in your screenshot is the exact
> same output I get with XeTeX, what is the issue then?
It worked fine in TL'12, the PDF's that failed are in directory
http://hroch486.icpf.cas.cz/xetex-test/0.9999.2-r2525/ (ie XeTeX
0.9999.2 and FreeFont rev 2525), see vatu.pdf in that directory. The
remaining files in this directory show other problems. Whenever there
is a new version of XeTeX, I can rerun my tests and report the
> Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
More information about the XeTeX