[XeTeX] The future of XeTeX

Zdenek Wagner zdenek.wagner at gmail.com
Wed Aug 1 19:30:00 CEST 2012

2012/8/1 Ulrike Fischer <news3 at nililand.de>:
> Am Wed, 1 Aug 2012 17:17:15 +0100 schrieb Philip TAYLOR:
>> Keith J. Schultz wrote:
>>>      That is probaly teh biggest turn off to LuaTeX.
>>>      They should some people in as far as coding is concerned.
>>>      The missing documentation is something I would call a cardinal
>>>      offense.
>> For something that is free (in the real sense of the word,
>> not as some would have us re-define it), can you really complain
>> if there is no documentation ?
> I do. Bad work (and a large package without documentation is bad
> work) is bad work even if it is free. Nobody force people to offer
> their work for free, but if they do they should imho take the critic
> as they take the praise.
Who forces you to use someone else's undocumented software? You can
write your own well documented software.
> --
> Ulrike Fischer
> http://www.troubleshooting-tex.de/
> --------------------------------------------------
> Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
>   http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex

Zdeněk Wagner

More information about the XeTeX mailing list