[XeTeX] The future of XeTeX

Zdenek Wagner zdenek.wagner at gmail.com
Wed Aug 1 14:47:50 CEST 2012

2012/8/1 Simon Spiegel <simon at simifilm.ch>:
> Some comments from a long time lurker here on this mailing list: I've been following this discussion with great interest but unfortunately it follows the same pattern of many similar discussions in the past. The question on how things could be improved is soon split up into various, often very technical, subdiscussions. Those are often very interesting, but IMO they avoid the main point which should be dealt with.
> I don't intend to criticize anybody and maybe I'm stating the super obvious, but all these discussions are moot unless some is actually willing and able to come up and do some coding.
> The subject of polyglossia has been brought up. I guess we all agree that polyglossia for LuaLaTeX would be a good thing. There also seems to be a consensus that this is technically doable. But this has already been discussed three years ago at least. AFAICS nothing much has happened so far. Similar with microtype for XeTeX. Until I'm mistaken we still only have parts of microtype implemented for XeTeX and only in a beta version of microtype. Again I hear that this should be doable for XeTeX but nothing has happened so far.
There was a problem with polyglossia because Françoise Charette left
academia and no longer had time to maintain it. The current maintainer
is Arthur Reutenauer. I hope that a few volunteers could help him.
Microtypography is not just a matter of the microtype package, the
internals must offer proper primitives. I do not know whether they are
already available. It is not easy in some scripts, eg in Indic scripts
due to glyph reordering.

> I may have missed some posts, but so far I've only seen Simon Cozens offering to actually work on improving the situation.
> As I said, I don't want to criticize anybody for not coming up with working solutions. No one can be blamed if these things don't get done. But I really believe that we had enough of theoretical discussions in the past on how things could be done. What we need is people doing it. I think this kind of discussion should mainly be concerned with the question on how we can create a situation where people actually can deliver solutions. Is it a question of money? Would something like a kickstarter campaign help in finding people who can come up with the needed code? Personally, I'd be more than willing to pledge some code for this. Or is it a question of lack of knowledge (too few people are actually competent enough). Or is it something else?
In the past TeX users groups financially supported several projects
(Latin Modern, TeX Gyre, mplib). I believe that money can be found for
future projects as well. It is necessary to find someone who will
actually do the job. Maybe some PhD student can do it, I do not

As I wrote (probably privately), I have test files that were used for
testing Devanagari in GNU FreeFont. They could be useful if someone
decides to implement Devanagari in luatex, I can help with testing but
not with development.

> Simon
> --
> Simon Spiegel
> Steinhaldenstr. 50
> 8002 Zürich
> Telephon: ++41 44 451 5334
> Mobophon: ++41 76 459 6039
> http://www.simifilm.ch
> "The first rule of Tautology Club is the first rule of Tautology Club."
> --------------------------------------------------
> Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
>   http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex

Zdeněk Wagner

More information about the XeTeX mailing list