[XeTeX] Hyphenation in Transliterated Sanskrit

Dominik Wujastyk wujastyk at gmail.com
Sun Oct 2 21:27:18 CEST 2011


oh, I completely misunderstood your question, Phil.

The answer is: none.  It's a rendering artefact.

Dominik

On 2 October 2011 23:47, Zdenek Wagner <zdenek.wagner at gmail.com> wrote:

> 2011/10/2 Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) <P.Taylor at rhul.ac.uk>:
> >
> >
> > Cyril Niklaus wrote:
> >
> >> Because that's how his name is spelled.  You have guttural, palatal,
> >> retroflex and dental n in Devanāgarī, respectively ङ ṅa
> >> ; ञ ña; ण ṇa and न na.
> >
> > Yes, but all "n" variants are normally the same size, modulo the
> diacritics.
> >
> Its not so uncommon that two fonts with the same design size have
> different x-height. If your computer has to select one character from
> a different font because it does not exist in your main font, such
> discrepancies can be expected. At my computer ṅ appears lower. I do
> not know where fonconfig takes it from, probably from the John Smith's
> fonts.
>
> >> The guttural na is transcribed using a superscript dot, but maybe you do
> >> not have it in a standard font, and your MUA used whatever font was
> >> available, therefore this extra height you're talking about.  I'm not
> sure
> >> if I've correctly understood you, to be honest.
> >
> > Agreed : I have changed my font preferences for "Other languages"
> > (odd way of having to tell it which font to use for UTF-8 !),
> > and now all four n variants are the same height.
> >
> > Philip Taylor
> >
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------
> > Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
> >  http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Zdeněk Wagner
> http://hroch486.icpf.cas.cz/wagner/
> http://icebearsoft.euweb.cz
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
>  http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://tug.org/pipermail/xetex/attachments/20111003/09dc299f/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the XeTeX mailing list