[XeTeX] Polyglossia "broken"?

[Alan Munn]

On Oct 2, 2011, at 7:36 AM, Dominik Wujastyk wrote:

> there seem to be two git versions of polyglossia, i.e., it's been forked.  Or am I wrong?  Philipp's and Francois'

Yes and no.  The way github works is that when someone proposes a change, they fork it to their own account and then notify the owner of the code, who is able to incorporate the changes in that fork into the main branch of the code if the change is accepted.

So Philipp's fork is the result of his having proposed the xkeyval fix.

Alan

> 
> 
> 
> On 1 October 2011 23:52, Alan Munn <amunn at gmx.com> wrote:
> On Oct 1, 2011, at 2:13 PM, Alan Munn wrote:
> 
>> On Oct 1, 2011, at 1:23 PM, Dominik Wujastyk wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> If anyone knows how to work git (I use it so rarely that I always have to start from scratch) then feel free to add this to the git hub.  If anyone wishes to package this for CTAN, please do so.
>> 
>> I've added the change to the git version.  The question is whether Françcois (or the other person with commit permissions has the time to merge the change and upload the new version.)
> 
> 
> Actually, Philipp has already proposed the same change to the git version.
> 
> Alan
> 
> --
> Alan Munn
> amunn at gmx.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------
> Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
> 
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------
> Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
> http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex

-- 
Alan Munn
amunn at gmx.com