[XeTeX] arabxetex vs. xepersian
garzohugo at gmail.com
Mon Oct 4 21:53:13 CEST 2010
Axel Kielhorn wrote:
> Am 03.10.2010 um 22:41 schrieb Gareth Hughes:
>> ArabXeTeX does a similar job to Polyglossia when it comes to font
>> set-up and commands for language change. However, ArabXeTeX
>> specialises in using input in Latin transliteration to render
>> Arabic. It is designed to work with the various languages that use
>> Arabic-derived scripts. I don't find this that useful (though I
>> know some do, and respect their preference), seeing as I can enter
>> both Arabic and the Latin diacritics needed for scientific
>> transliteration in Unicode.
> If I understand it correctly, latin input is just an option. It will
> be processed by TECkit into Unicode.
Yes, it has a very nice implementation of TECkit. Of course it's an
option, but it's a major feature available in ArabXeTeX.
>> XePersian does something completely different. It adds some
>> valuable tools that refine Persian typesetting. It adds /kashida/
>> justification and Persian-language aliases for commands (it's
>> annoying to have to change script/keyboard and text direction to
>> enter commands).
> I now see that kashida is xepersian only, I need to mention that.
> I remember a discussion about using kashida in other languages as
> well but haven't seen anything in the documentation.
Fr Michael Gilmary adapted Jonathan Kew's code for Syriac, and I'm
including that in my forthcoming Syriac package.
More information about the XeTeX