[XeTeX] unicode-math testing

[David Cottenden]

Nikos Platis wrote:
> Interesting...
>
> On a fully updated TeXLive 2009 on Linux i386, with XeTeX
> 3.1415926-2.2-0.9995.2, the sample runs fine.
>
> On a fully updated TeXLive 2009 on Linux x86_64, with XeTeX
> 3.1415926-2.2-0.9995.2, I get a segmentation fault!
> This seems to happen when processing unicode-math-table.tex, the log stops at
>
>   
There appear to be quite a number of little differences between 64 and 
32 bit versions of things. I recall corresponding with Will some time 
ago about big symbols not expanding under x64 when using nominally the 
same setup was fine in i386.

We (well, Will - I don't know the second thing about it) didn't get it 
solved at the time IIRC, but maybe the problems have a common root?

> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:55, Will Robertson <wspr81 at gmail.com> wrote:
>   
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I am almost to release my long-delayed "unicode-math" package, but an issue has arisen that I don't know how to debug. It is only reproducible under Windows while using the Asana Math font; a different font or a different platform gives acceptable output.
>>
>> The system being used is Windows Vista with:
>>
>>     
>>> This is XeTeX, Version 3.1415926-2.2-0.9995.1 (MiKTeX 2.8) (preloaded format=xelatex 2010.5.20)  25 MAY 2010 16:32
>>>       
>> After selecting the maths font, the output is garbled; each glyph is off-by-one:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I've attached a minimal document with all the necessary files to reproduce this problem. Would anyone (especially with Windows) be able to try this out? Or is this a known problem that I've forgotten about?
>>
>> -- Will
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
>>  http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
>>
>>
>>     
>
>
>
>   

-- 
David Cottenden
PhD Student
Continence and Skin Technology Group
UCL

Phone: +44 (0)20 7288 3771
Fax: +44 (0)20 7288 3019