[XeTeX] PDF Creator: "bidi"?

Rembrandt Wolpert wolpert at uark.edu
Thu Mar 11 17:14:24 CET 2010

because bidi has done absolutely noting in the creation of the pdf-file from
this minimal text, but claims it:



On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 05:33, Vafa Khalighi <vafa at users.berlios.de> wrote:

>> This is question for Vafa: can you explain what is the reason that in .pdf
>> file, created using xelatex+polyglossia with use of arabic as secondary
>> language (the main is latin), bidi is credited as "creator"? I do understand
>> that bidi is used for arabic, but, with due respect, I think it's very
>> unfair to declare it as creator application instead of xe(la)tex.
> I have done this because someone in the past requested it. Why is this
> unfair?
> --
> Best wishes,
> Vafa Khalighi
> --------------------------------------------------
> Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
>  http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://tug.org/pipermail/xetex/attachments/20100311/f99c2328/attachment.html>

More information about the XeTeX mailing list