[XeTeX] Ligatures no tproberly rendered in Gillius ADF Condensed
Peter Dyballa
Peter_Dyballa at Web.DE
Sat Dec 4 18:29:51 CET 2010
Am 04.12.2010 um 17:40 schrieb Joachim Trinkwitz:
> Because you use a certain tool, it is more correct than other
> people's? Isn't this a rather silly statement? Well, if you think
> Linotypes font manager is lying on me, then you know better, I
> suppose ... (even the fact that several tools shows different
> results, should make you think about the quality of the font).
FontForge shows seven different ligatures in the range of U+FB00-U
+FB06 (f_f, f_i, f_l, f_f_i, f_f_l, longs_t, s_t)... Regular, Italic,
Cond – in CondItalic f_f, f_f_i, f_f_l, longs_t, s_t are blank though
the font claims that they're there.
--
Mit friedvollen Grüßen
Pete
Es gibt 10 Sorten Leute: solche, die binär verstehen, und solche, die
es nicht verstehen.
More information about the XeTeX
mailing list