On 15 May 2009, at 00:29, Karl Berry wrote: > I will look into the question of increasing font_max beyond 2000, Fine, but not relevant to this issue, I think. > but it > seems bizarre for [foo.otf] and [foo] to have this difference in > behavior. Yes, it does. I'll try to look into this.... > Is this also somehow related to AAT vs. OT? I don't think so. JK