[XeTeX] Memoir class font problem

Fr. Michael Gilmary FrMichaelGilmary at MaroniteMonks.org
Sun Jun 14 19:23:23 CEST 2009

Nicolas Vaughan wrote:

> Sorry, it worked fine. I had to change the second header definition.
> Why do you define it twice, on lines 18--22 and on lines 65-70?

It's an old file ... and I cut it up to get the example. No doubt, there 
are scraps of all kinds of things left in there!

If I remember correctly, the first def of ruled pagestyle is for the 
Index ( = latin for toc), which is defined somewhere inside with a 
header style I didn't like for some reason. In fact, I don't think I 
ever got it to work anyway! So, it can be safely removed.

> PS I Iiked you dypthongs.

You know what they say: "de gustibus non est disputandum" which those of 
different tastes have mutilated to say "disgustibus non est disputandum".

If you're interested, I can send you (off-list) the complete work (just 
over 500 pages). Of course, I may have to work on it some if we get this 
figured out!

United in adoration of Jesus, 

fr. michael gilmary, mma

Most Holy Trinity Monastery
67 Dugway Road
Petersham, MA 01366-9725

More information about the XeTeX mailing list