[XeTeX] Memoir class font problem
Fr. Michael Gilmary
FrMichaelGilmary at MaroniteMonks.org
Sun Jun 14 19:23:23 CEST 2009
Nicolas Vaughan wrote:
> Sorry, it worked fine. I had to change the second header definition.
> Why do you define it twice, on lines 18--22 and on lines 65-70?
It's an old file ... and I cut it up to get the example. No doubt, there
are scraps of all kinds of things left in there!
If I remember correctly, the first def of ruled pagestyle is for the
Index ( = latin for toc), which is defined somewhere inside with a
header style I didn't like for some reason. In fact, I don't think I
ever got it to work anyway! So, it can be safely removed.
> PS I Iiked you dypthongs.
You know what they say: "de gustibus non est disputandum" which those of
different tastes have mutilated to say "disgustibus non est disputandum".
If you're interested, I can send you (off-list) the complete work (just
over 500 pages). Of course, I may have to work on it some if we get this
United in adoration of Jesus,
fr. michael gilmary, mma
Most Holy Trinity Monastery
67 Dugway Road
Petersham, MA 01366-9725
More information about the XeTeX